-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Miller wrote: >> Legacy is all about security-updates!!! ONLY!!! The policy is >> update with PATCHES if at all possible. From RH even better; >> otherwise fall back to other sources for patches such as the >> development groups, etc. Only if EVERYTHING else fails, you can >> update to the latest stable release to fix the flaw. > > Right now, everything is clearly failing. > No, I think what is failing is that Legacy has never had a policy other that extras was not included in the security concerns. There are hundreds of packages to cope with and many people are stretched very thin. :'( There is literally a hand full of people managing all the packages and it is up to the users to keep track and raise issues with packages. The managers of the packages then run around trying to come up with the fixes. Some of which are not plain and simple. Then they need to go through the QA process and etc. This all leads to TIME. Unfortunately, most people are hard at work with say FC6 to really devote great attention to the current FL project. So, we have been left to fend for ourselves. The last straw was probably the decision to lighten the load and get rid of all the other legacy supported (releases) and concentrate on one to two FL releases at most.... All of this and more has forced many to abandon supporting FL in favor of other platforms with continued support. In short, people willing and able to do all the work necessary has dwindled to but a few. Jesse and a few others, mostly working at RH serving many roles on other projects. Just my 2-cents. James -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFORhxkNLDmnu1kSkRAv9GAJ9FOcPqqp4RZrsd4kvGZkdF48RdJwCfeOk/ ctVFXAmj0eEm95TrDFm9/kg= =/7Bx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
