On Jun 10, 2006, at 12:18 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 6/9/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As we approach FC6 Test2, we should make a decision wrt RHL7.3/9
and
> FC1/2. We've been supporting these releases for a while now, and
> they've grown pretty long in the tooth, even by Legacy
standards. Our
> lifetime policy would dictate that FC1 should be gone already,
and FC2
> would go when we pick up FC4, so that we're only supporting FC3
and FC4.
> The RHL releases are a different matter.
>
+1 for killing rhl 7.3, 9, fc1 and fc2 when fc4 comes in.
I think so too. If people need support for RHL-7.3/9 they need to pay
someone to support it or move to something else. The amount of time
trying to get a patched set done, tested, and finished is a full-time
job for people.
I agree with this - let's do away with RHL and FC1/FC2 support once
we take on FC4. Jesse has already given many good reasons for doing
so, so I won't repeat them here again :)
-Jeff
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
