Re: Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/9/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As we approach FC6 Test2, we should make a decision wrt RHL7.3/9 and
> FC1/2.  We've been supporting these releases for a while now, and
> they've grown pretty long in the tooth, even by Legacy standards.  Our
> lifetime policy would dictate that FC1 should be gone already, and FC2
> would go when we pick up FC4, so that we're only supporting FC3 and FC4.
> The RHL releases are a different matter.
>

+1 for killing rhl 7.3, 9, fc1 and fc2 when fc4 comes in.


I think so too. If people need support for RHL-7.3/9 they need to pay
someone to support it or move to something else. The amount of time
trying to get a patched set done, tested, and finished is a full-time
job for people.


--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux