On 6/9/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > As we approach FC6 Test2, we should make a decision wrt RHL7.3/9 and > FC1/2. We've been supporting these releases for a while now, and > they've grown pretty long in the tooth, even by Legacy standards. Our > lifetime policy would dictate that FC1 should be gone already, and FC2 > would go when we pick up FC4, so that we're only supporting FC3 and FC4. > The RHL releases are a different matter. > +1 for killing rhl 7.3, 9, fc1 and fc2 when fc4 comes in.
I think so too. If people need support for RHL-7.3/9 they need to pay someone to support it or move to something else. The amount of time trying to get a patched set done, tested, and finished is a full-time job for people. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
