On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:43 -0500, James Kosin wrote: > Sounds like something didn't get built correctly. Was this a new > release of sendmail or a patch? > I believe my packages needed (or at least I let them build a -cf > package) at one point. My version has been working for some time with > no problems with man or other changes. > > Did the SPEC file change significantly? The patches supplied by Sendmail did not apply to older releases, so all releases had to be updated to 8.12.11. RHEL set a precedent on this when they updated the version on RHEL2.1. The spec did change in many ways, and unfortunately I didn't catch the significance of the changes w/regard to alternatives. These issues should be resolved in the newer packages in updates-testing. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
