Le Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:17:06 -0600 Debbie Tropiano <debbiet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrit: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 07:30:47AM -0600, Philip Molter wrote: > > I have several FC2 boxes that I'd like to upgrade but haven't gotten > > around to hitting yet (they'll probably go to FC4 ... > > As yet just another user (with no time or ability to help out at > this time), this is our situation as well. We have several FC2 > production systems that we're not ready to upgrade yet. We need > SNARE and until we can use that with the kernel auditing in FC4, > we can't upgrade (and yes, we are working on that issue). OTOH > since they're pretty stable, we pretty much leave them alone > (they're on a private network so fewer security issues). We also have a lot of FC2 servers in production. FC2 was the first distribution with kernel 2.6. In our environment (LAMP or mail servers without X11), newer FC release provide no real improvement. So we still use FC2 as it is much easier to manage only a few different distro (we still have RedHat 9 servers). -- Laurent Papier - 03 88 75 80 50 Admin. système - SdV Plurimedia - <http://www.sdv.fr/> -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
