Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike McCarty wrote:

Jesse Keating wrote:

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 02:31 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:

Ok then, it seems to me that there is no longer any distinction
between the released repository, and the test repository.
So, please send out an e-mail three days before the first
"timed release" so I can pull a last tested version before
removing the legacy repository from my yum configuration.



I appreciate your concern mike, however if we have people testing during
the timeout period, then there would be no untested packages.  If I see


I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.

If people are interested in testing and providing feedback they would be able to do that within the specified time limit. If a sufficient amount of people are not interested in providing feedback either the platform can be dropped out of the legacy maintenance or the update can be pushed into the main legacy repository after QA work done by the packager. That is the proposal. The way you can help is either by doing the QA work or suggesting alternative proposals that would help in preventing important security and bug fixes lagging in updates testing for a infinite amount of time awaiting feedback.

--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux