Re: [Fwd: [SECURITY] [DSA 817-1] New python2.2 packages fix arbitrary code execution]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 18:20 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, didn't the move to RH's bugzilla negate the 
> need for us to re-list our own bugs?  Isn't a bug in pcre a bug in pcre 
> regardless of the many flavors of RH that it affects?  I'm not involved 
> enough with bugzilla to know this, but it strikes me as odd that we 
> would have a duplicate bug entries in the same system.

RH's bugzilla has a different bug open for each platform the bug appears
on. So it should contain a bug for FC3, a bug for FC4, a bug for RHEL3,
a bug for legacy-FC1, etc.

Marc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux