Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 03:15:15PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:23:00AM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
It is hard to imagine that somebody
quietly fixed such hole in Python packages for Red Hat distributions
and did not mention that anybody.
Wouldn't this count:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-761.html
Count to what?
Count towards showing that RH had indeed released fixes. Isn't that
what you were stating above, that you hadn't seen any releases for RH yet?
Sigh! The above is about pcre itself and we are talking here about
a code embedded in Python. Unfortunately this is an independet,
although related, issue. There are now bugzilla numbers for that
(#166335 and #168318) but AFAICS no releases so far.
Would you like, please, to write a corresponding bugzilla entry for
Legacy packages or we should ask David for that? It appears that he
already collected all data.
Michal
Michal, I am confused about all your comments on this thread. I first
posted a question about this issue on 22-Sept. On that same day you
suggested I add it to bugzilla, I chose to wait for further input. Now
today I see that you already opened a bug back on 16-Sept
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168516
Why didn't you just say that this bug already existed?
-Jim P.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168516
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
