I'm inclined to go with option #3, but I'd want at least ONE verify. I don't know how many VERIFY marks are needed, but I'd suggest something like this: If 10 verify marks are needed currently, then drop that requirement by one per week, so that at 10 weeks, only 1 verify would be needed. That way, anything people think is important can go out fairly quickly, while still giving ample time to those who care to try it out first. I think 6 weeks is a tad short, I'd go more like 2-2.5 months, but 6 weeks would work. -Ben On Friday 26 August 2005 22:49, Pekka Savola wrote: > 3) just releasing them with lower amount of QA or no QA at all after > some timeout (e.g., 6 weeks) and revising if someone complains it > doesn't work right. -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978 -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
