Quoting Jim Popovitch <jimpop@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 15:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:31:11PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html, I see 95% of cruft that > > > makes it difficult to focus on the 4 or 5% that I care about. Do we > > > really need to be releasing a mozilla for rh73? > > > > Yes, if we consider rh73 supported at all. There's important remote > security > > flaws in the older version. > > I have rh73 installs that don't have mozilla installed. What's the > impact on me? The impact on you is it helps to hold up the other updates you are interested in. > My question is this: Do we waste time and distract from important > packages by crowding the field with application level patches for > allications that few (if anyone) is using. Seriously, who is using RH73 > in desktop environments? Do we have any stats on this? No stats, but I am. I just upgraded 2 7.3 servers, so now I stand roughly a dozen 7.3 desktops left, and maybe 2 7.3 servers left. So yes, some of us still use the old systems as "desktop" systems, and not just servers. By the end of the summer, I hope to have all my 7.x systems upgraded off it though, so next year the answer will be different... > -Jim P. -- Eric Rostetter -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
