On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 16:44 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:04:56PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > Yes, if we consider rh73 supported at all. There's important remote security > > > flaws in the older version. > > I have rh73 installs that don't have mozilla installed. What's the > > impact on me? > > Yeah, that attitude *is* exactly the problem. OK, what should be done to eliminate that attitude? Should I install mozilla on my RH73 servers just so that I have to update it? ;-) I'm not saying that because I don't use it nobody else should. What I am saying is that I don't use it and therefore don't see a need to test it. Are others using it? If so, why aren't they stepping up to test it? Do we have data on who needs what out of RH73? -Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
