On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:08:33PM -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote: > > >To be fair, it's basically what I've been pretty regularly saying the > > >policy is. So some of the blame there rests with me. As I see it, open > > >the door to "critical" non-security bugs is a problem, because it puts > > >us in the situation of having to decide what's critical and what's not > > >-- a more subjective determination than "is this a security flaw". > See the FAQ. The very first FAQ entry ever created addresses the issue > of what we support. Yeah. I guess specifically, given the limited resources we have (for example, I have 0 spare time -- *sigh*), I've been reading "In order to publish security updates in a timely manner, security updates have a higher priority than any other updates" extremely strictly. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 73 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
