On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 04:01:00PM -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote: > But it is an unfounded frustration, as your understanding of the policy is > incorrect. To be fair, it's basically what I've been pretty regularly saying the policy is. So some of the blame there rests with me. As I see it, open the door to "critical" non-security bugs is a problem, because it puts us in the situation of having to decide what's critical and what's not -- a more subjective determination than "is this a security flaw". -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 73 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
