On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:57 -0400, David Curry wrote: > Before gravitating elsewhere, though, I will offer an opinion. > Unless > there is a restrictive covenent in Red Hat's support of Fedora Legacy > that limits updates to "security" and "trivial" patches, there is > reason > to consider broadening "updates policy" somewhat beyond security > only. > Fedora Legacy updates policy and willingness of the community to > support > Fedora Legacy are not independent of one another. However the issue > is > resolved I wish the group well. A) more man power is needed B) more things can break, and thats not acceptable to the people who are using Fedora / Red Hat in a longer term than what Red Hat itself supports. If you need an OS that has a long life span and gets some feature and non-security bugfixing over time, please look at Red Hat Enterprise Linux or the plethora of free rebuilds of it. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
