On Friday 18 Mar 2005 7:42 pm, Pekka Savola wrote: > Hi, > > I'll remind again that there are a lot of packages that require only > minor testing to be fully released. We need the folks to do this > VERIFY. > > Below is the list of those packages for which a VERIFY is only needed > on one architecture: > > Please help! > > ========== > openmotif - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2143 > Needs VERIFY [fc1] > > sharutils - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2155 > Needs VERIFY [fc1] > > mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2419 > Needs VERIFY [rh73] > > ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007 > Needs VERIFY [fc1] > > qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002 > Needs VERIFY [rh73] > > mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2129 > Needs VERIFY [fc1] > > ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2407 > Needs VERIFY [fc1] > > spamassassin - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2268 > Needs VERIFY [fc1] > > dhcp - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2251 > Needs VERIFY [rh73] > > imap - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2443 > Needs VERIFY [fc1] > =========== > > btw, I guess nobody cares about FC1 anymore. Unless someone actually > adds a verify to some of those packages, I suggest we just either a) > release the already verified versions and skip FC1, or b) not verify > FC1 at all, but ship it in any case. > > I really hope there are more people out there willing to do QA for the > upcoming FC2... > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list I only run Ethereal off the need to be verified list. I use FC1 a lot. Just tell me what I need to do and I'll check the Ethereal one out. Nigel -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
