Re: just one VERIFY to be fully published

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 21:42 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:

<snip>
> btw, I guess nobody cares about FC1 anymore.  Unless someone actually 
> adds a verify to some of those packages, I suggest we just either a) 
> release the already verified versions and skip FC1, or b) not verify 
> FC1 at all, but ship it in any case.

i have been spending my time moving from fc1 to rhel4, but i still have
a few fc1 boxes around.  it is no problem for me to check sha1sums, gpg
signatures, or to verify that packages install.  but, for example,
because i don't use imap it would be a PITA to verify that it functioned
correctly and that its bugs were fixed.

i'll see if i can verify some of the easier packages for fc1...

rob.

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux