On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 14:18 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 11:07 -0800, David Rees wrote: > > A bit of a catch 22: You need resources to publish security > > updates, but the resources aren't there because it's a > > PITA to do the work. > > No offense, but that's not a catch-22. A catch-22 would be needing > resources to publish security updates, but the resources aren't there > because of the lack of timely reliable security updates. (quite > accurate of FL's current situation) I guess I can re-read your catch-22 to see that you probably were trying to say the same thing with your "PITA" comment. -Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
