On Thursday 03 March 2005 12:59, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:54 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > But FL does need to have the same *quality*. > No it doesn't. FL can't have the same quality of RHEL w/out another Red > Hat backing it, and last time I checked, cloning isn't quite possible > yet. I'm sorry, but thats just the way it is. This is a COMMUNITY > project and you're going to get COMMUNITY quality. +1 Fedora Legacy Project provides legacy support, "the COMMUNITY WAY" to a fastly evolving Red Hat project aimed as a hacker's Linux distribution. Fedora is not RHEL. > > Quality doesn't come > > easily, and it's not something that should be taken lightly. > I'm not taking it lightly at all. I'm trying to do the best we can, > realistically. Fedora Legacy is doing the best job that a limited commmunity like this can handle. Beliving or expecting anything else is unrealisticaly wrong. Regards, Josep -- Josep L. Guallar-Esteve Eastern Radiologists, Inc. Systems and PACS Administration http://www.easternrad.com
Attachment:
pgpEUBVbLxxYq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
