On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:25:21PM -0500, Eric Wood wrote: > Well, that's the achilles heel with rpm. There's tons of rpms out there > that will work fine and compile fine with older dependant package but > theres a superficial requirement that a newer package is need. Huh? -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
