Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: b.pennacchi@xxxxxxxxxxx, Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
From: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:12:51 +0100
Cc:
In-reply-to: <20040915183239.GA4049@sibannac>
References: <20040914235259.0EF01736C0@hormel.redhat.com> <20040915183239.GA4049@sibannac>
Reply-to: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: fedora-legacy-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

(coming late to the discussion...)

Could you do a rpm -qa python\* yum ; rpm -V yum python python2?

Regards,
Luciano Rocha


--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
  - From: Barbara Pennacchi

References:
- Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
  - From: Barbara Pennacchi

Prev by Date: Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
Next by Date: current gdk-pixbuf alerts
Previous by thread: Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
Next by thread: Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite Questions]

Powered by Linux