Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: <
b.pennacchi@xxxxxxxxxxx
>, "Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project" <
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
From
: "S.Joseph" <
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:50:49 -0400
Cc
:
References
: <20040914235259.0EF01736C0@hormel.redhat.com> <
20040915183239.GA4049@sibannac
>
Reply-to
: "S.Joseph" <
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>, Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Sender
:
fedora-legacy-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Yes Barbara , I used your original mail as reference (2.3.2)
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/2004-August/msg00097.html
good luck. take care.
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
References
:
Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
From:
Barbara Pennacchi
Prev by Date:
Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
Next by Date:
Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
Previous by thread:
Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
Next by thread:
Re: yum broken :p (quick replies)
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Development]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Config]
[PAM]
[Fedora General Discussion]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite Questions]