On Thursday 20 May 2004 15:53, Howard Owen wrote: > Businesses I have knowledge of have shied away from Fedora Core > because of the rapid rate of change issue. In my opinion, folks who > have taken the plunge with FC1 on production machines really need to > seriously consider upgrading to FC2. This is in line with the > objectives quoted above. Red Hat and the volunteers at the Fedora > project seem to have tried awfully hard to make that as smooth as > possible. (c.f. *not turning on SELinux by default.) Sure there is a rapid change rate. Fedora Legacy was originally concieved to provide a longer life span for Fedora Core releases. The support for RHL 7.3/9 is just a byproduct of this, an added bonus. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
pgp00342.pgp
Description: signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
