I know you've thought about what it will mean to support three releases a year, *every year*. How about picking just one a year? On Thu, 20 May 2004, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 20 May 2004 15:53, Howard Owen wrote: > > Businesses I have knowledge of have shied away from Fedora Core > > because of the rapid rate of change issue. In my opinion, folks who > > have taken the plunge with FC1 on production machines really need to > > seriously consider upgrading to FC2. This is in line with the > > objectives quoted above. Red Hat and the volunteers at the Fedora > > project seem to have tried awfully hard to make that as smooth as > > possible. (c.f. *not turning on SELinux by default.) > > Sure there is a rapid change rate. Fedora Legacy was originally > concieved to provide a longer life span for Fedora Core releases. The > support for RHL 7.3/9 is just a byproduct of this, an added bonus. > > -- Howard Owen "Even if you are on the right EGBOK Consultants track, you'll get run over if you hbo@xxxxxxxxx +1-650-218-2216 just sit there." - Will Rogers -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
