On Wednesday 21 January 2004 17:22, Warren Togami wrote: > RH's policy is ANY PACKAGE THAT LEAVES YOUR LOCAL SYSTEM must always > bump the release number. > > For Legacy I would suggeset not bumping a number only for a rebuild > on the higher distribution, but instead adding some sort of disttag. > For example: > > foo-1.3.5-2.7.2.legacy > foo-1.3.5-2.7.3.legacy > foo-1.3.5-2.8.legacy yeah, this isn't the issue that I was talking about. A package was posted to bugzilla, we found a bug in it, fixed the bug, do we bump the build number on that package (and put it out of skew with the rest of the packages)? > Do this ONLY if the only spec change is the release number, and the > versions were unified for the purpose of making it easier to maintain > in the future. Also recall the earlier agreed upon policy that any > upgrading of versions for the purpose of unifying versions across > distributions must be explicitly communicated on the list and agreed > upon by consensus. > > (By consensus, I would suggest making it among past contributors.) Totally agreeable. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
pgp00227.pgp
Description: signature
