If it were me carrying the load, I'd support 7.3 since getting to 7.3 from 7.x seems fairly painless, and my perception is that 7.x is fairly widely used. Getting from 7.x to 8 appears to be difficult for enough folks that I'd not push the 7.3 group to 8.0, but going 8 to 9 seems to be both a smaller set of people and less painful, so the next thing I'd support is 9. If I were to add a third supported point it would be 6.latest, not 8. The theory is to maintain hold-points where moving up to the next release is relatively more painful than was getting to the hold-point. which version(s) of Fedora to consider hold-points I can't at this time guess. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (610)796-5838 >>> rcaskey@xxxxxxx 12/02/03 08:55PM >>> Oky, thought I would check in now that everyone has had a few days to digest things. Now is the time for discussion! ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated **********************************************************************
