Oky, thought I would check in now that everyone has had a few days to digest things. http://www.fedora.us/wiki/EveryOtherRelease has a good summary of the issues at hand. Please weigh in if you have yet to do so! For you folks who favor select, but not exactly time-based supported releases, I will say that I am afraid this will put another potato in our hands and just gives us a lot of tough choices to make. I think that a hard-line every other release would lend an element of certainty to Legacy that would be reassuring and conforming to the project goals. Anyway, people, please continue to way in. If it seems clear that selected release support is the way to go, then we can worry about specifics. Now is the time for discussion! Sincerely, Rob J. Caskey On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 22:45, Mike Vanecek wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:56:56 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote > > On Wednesday 26 November 2003 12:01, Martin Stricker wrote: > > > Agreed. I'm interested only in the really stable releases anyway > > > (like 5.2, 6.2, and 7.3). Hopefully a FC release will stand up for > > > this as well. Future will show... > > > > The current Red Hat Linux releases are special cases to Legacy. > > Those I want to support until they're pried from our cold dead > > hands. > > Thank you, thank you, thank you. > > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
