On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:44:55AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:45:34PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > > On Wed, 6 May 2020 07:37:35 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > > Good idea and I think it would be a smart thing to do. > > > > I generally agree but I don't think "ark" is the best option. The > > kernels are used for Fedora, too, and they will be used for RHEL. We > > should find a prefix that works for all of those kernels/distros. > > I was trying to think of something but I could not find anything > > suitable. It should be short (rules out "downstream") and easily > > remembered (rules out abbreviations for "downstream"). > > I had the same opinion. As we migrated the redhat/ over directly from RHEL, > it is very much polluted with RHELisms. I am happy to clean up the > RHELisms, I would like to use a generic term that covers > Fedora/CentOS-stream/RHEL/ARK. > > I had thoughts of using 'distro' and using that as a generic framework to > push upstream for other distros to plug into, but I never fully flushed out > that idea (ie s/redhat\//distro\//;s/rh-/distro-/). > > Though 'distro' is a tad cumbersome. 'os' may work as it is short enough > (using Prarit's suggestion) but is it intuitively descriptive enough? > 'dist'? I like the shortness of os, but as you say it's not super descriptive. I don't have strong feelings either way, though. - Jeremy _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
