On 5/6/20 3:55 PM, Jeremy Cline wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:44:55AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: >> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:45:34PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: >>> On Wed, 6 May 2020 07:37:35 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >>>> Good idea and I think it would be a smart thing to do. >>> >>> I generally agree but I don't think "ark" is the best option. The >>> kernels are used for Fedora, too, and they will be used for RHEL. We >>> should find a prefix that works for all of those kernels/distros. >>> I was trying to think of something but I could not find anything >>> suitable. It should be short (rules out "downstream") and easily >>> remembered (rules out abbreviations for "downstream"). >> >> I had the same opinion. As we migrated the redhat/ over directly from RHEL, >> it is very much polluted with RHELisms. I am happy to clean up the >> RHELisms, I would like to use a generic term that covers >> Fedora/CentOS-stream/RHEL/ARK. >> >> I had thoughts of using 'distro' and using that as a generic framework to >> push upstream for other distros to plug into, but I never fully flushed out >> that idea (ie s/redhat\//distro\//;s/rh-/distro-/). >> >> Though 'distro' is a tad cumbersome. 'os' may work as it is short enough >> (using Prarit's suggestion) but is it intuitively descriptive enough? >> > > 'dist'? I like the shortness of os, but as you say it's not super > descriptive. I don't have strong feelings either way, though. dist would work too. jbenc? dzickus? Anyone else before I push a patch? P. > > - Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
