Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc4.1.cki.fc31 (ark)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:03 PM Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > From: "Justin Forbes" <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "CKI Project" <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Jianwen Ji" <jiji@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Hangbin Liu" <haliu@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Kernel
> > Fedora" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Memory Management"
> > <mm-qe@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Jianlin Shi" <jishi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Jan Stancek"
> > <jstancek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 6:14:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc4.1.cki.fc31 (ark)
>
> > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:33 AM CKI Project < cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx >
> wrote:
>
> > > Hello,
> >
>
> > > We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> >
>
> > > Kernel repo: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark.git
> >
> > > Commit: 1fe2554e03ff - [redhat]
> > > kernel-5.7.0-0.rc4.20200506gitdc56c5acd850.1
> >
>
> > > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> >
>
> > > Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> >
> > > Merge: OK
> >
> > > Compile: OK
> >
> > > Tests: FAILED
> >
>
> > > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download
> > > here:
> >
>
> > Somewhat curious as to why we are running Rawhide kernels built against
> fc31?
> > It is somewhat helpful from a "this will eventually be rebased to f31"
> case,
> > but with Rawhide and F32 being on gcc10, and a few other changes, it is
> not
> > always expected that an ARK srpm will build/boot/run on an older version
> of
> > Fedora. For the rebase case, we don't pull all spec changes back, really
> > just patches and (most) configs.
>
> Hi,
>
> we're currently in the process of migrating to fc32. There are some tests
> that won't compile with GCC10 and need to be updated before we switch the
> test environment.
>
> Ideally we'd switch the full pipeline to fc32 at once to avoid causing more
> issues, but we could switch ARK builds to a rawhide builder in the
> meanwhile
> if it's helpful.
>
>
> Veronika
>
> > Justin
>

It might be helpful. There are definitely more issues right now where
things build on f31 but not on Rawhide, but going forward as things evolve
in rawhide, it is good to know that at least the build was done there.  Of
course if any of the tests are building out of tree modules, that will not
work since fedora doesn't support modversions.

Justin
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux