Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/23/20 3:28 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am 22.04.20 um 22:00 schrieb Don Zickus:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:44:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Am 20.04.20 um 18:55 schrieb Don Zickus:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>> Am 17.04.20 um 22:06 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
>>>>>> Am 17.04.20 um 20:55 schrieb Don Zickus:
>>> How about something like this:
>>> * For Source0 on Rawhide with its daily snapshots use something like this:
>>> Source0: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/snapshot/linux-ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936.tar.gz
>>> (taken from
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936
>>> Use something like this everywhere else:
>>> Source0: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/snapshot/linux-5.6.6.tar.gz
>>> * For rawhide and its daily snapshots just trust what everyone can download at git.kernel.org. Everywhere else verify the signed tag in the %prep section of the spec file just like the packaging guidelines suggest:
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_verifying_signatures
>> […]
>> Implementing your suggested changes make take a little time to go through
>> the spaghetti we created.  Let me work with Jeremy and Justin about what is
>> the best course of action.
> 
> Thx.
> 
>> For now, I am tracking this issue as
>> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/28 to not lose it.
>> Does that work for you?
> 
> Yeah, sure, no need to hurry.
> 
> BTW: I know, renaming branches is hard, but when you go thought the
> spaghetti could you please consider renaming the "internal" branch to
> something more intuitive? I have no better name at hand, but "rpmify" or
> something like that would make it a lot more obvious what the changes in
> that branch are about.
> 

"os-build" is what I was suggesting.

P.

> Thx for your work, Cu, knurd
> _______________________________________________
> kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux