Em Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:22:53AM -0400, Josh Boyer escreveu:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:10:11 -0400
> > Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:01:21PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> >> wrote:
> >> > Em Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:51:35AM -0400, Josh Boyer escreveu:
> >> > > Thanks. I'll look at getting this into today's rawhide build.
> >> > FYI, checked with Jiri Olsa and he tells me that in RHEL7 it is:
> >> > %if %{with_perf}
> >> > BuildRequires: elfutils-devel zlib-devel binutils-devel bison
> >> > BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel
> >> > %ifnarch s390 s390x
> >> > BuildRequires: numactl-devel
> >> > %endif
> >> > %endif
> >> Thanks. I'll leave it as-is until the secondary arch teams request
> >> numa support.
> > my opinion is to go with the RHEL %ifnarch s390 s390x - we (at least
> > ppc + s390) want to be close to the enterprise kernel
> But then I have to do work instead of just running 'git am' :). OK,
> OK. I'll tweak it to match RHEL.
Thanks, my comment was on that line, its possible that this whole
process happened in RHEL, i.e. justification to be like that, and in
this case, Fedora should try to match that, if we find problems with
that, then we tell RHEL, etc, i.e. symbiosis. :-)
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
