On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:10:11 -0400
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:01:21PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> > Em Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:51:35AM -0400, Josh Boyer escreveu:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 06:51:50PM +0200, Petr Holasek wrote:
> > > > Patch makes perf package dependent on numactl-devel and so
> > > > enables numa subsystem benchmarks for perf bench command.
> > > > numactl-devel is added to the buildroot just for x86 archs,
> > > > because we don't ship libnuma for any others architectures.
> > > >
> > > > Can be easily reproduced by calling 'perf bench numa mem -a':
> > > >
> > > > - current output:
> > > >
> > > > 'Unknown subsystem:numa'
> > > >
> > > > - built with this patch:
> > > >
> > > > 'Running numa/mem benchmark...'
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks. I'll look at getting this into today's rawhide build.
> >
> > FYI, checked with Jiri Olsa and he tells me that in RHEL7 it is:
> >
> > %if %{with_perf}
> > BuildRequires: elfutils-devel zlib-devel binutils-devel bison
> > BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel
> > %ifnarch s390 s390x
> > BuildRequires: numactl-devel
> > %endif
> > %endif
>
> Thanks. I'll leave it as-is until the secondary arch teams request
> numa support.
my opinion is to go with the RHEL %ifnarch s390 s390x - we (at least
ppc + s390) want to be close to the enterprise kernel
Dan
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
