On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:10:11 -0400
> Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:01:21PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>> wrote:
>> > Em Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:51:35AM -0400, Josh Boyer escreveu:
>> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 06:51:50PM +0200, Petr Holasek wrote:
>> > > > Patch makes perf package dependent on numactl-devel and so
>> > > > enables numa subsystem benchmarks for perf bench command.
>> > > > numactl-devel is added to the buildroot just for x86 archs,
>> > > > because we don't ship libnuma for any others architectures.
>> > > >
>> > > > Can be easily reproduced by calling 'perf bench numa mem -a':
>> > > >
>> > > > - current output:
>> > > >
>> > > > 'Unknown subsystem:numa'
>> > > >
>> > > > - built with this patch:
>> > > >
>> > > > 'Running numa/mem benchmark...'
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > >
>> > > Thanks. I'll look at getting this into today's rawhide build.
>> >
>> > FYI, checked with Jiri Olsa and he tells me that in RHEL7 it is:
>> >
>> > %if %{with_perf}
>> > BuildRequires: elfutils-devel zlib-devel binutils-devel bison
>> > BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel
>> > %ifnarch s390 s390x
>> > BuildRequires: numactl-devel
>> > %endif
>> > %endif
>>
>> Thanks. I'll leave it as-is until the secondary arch teams request
>> numa support.
>
> my opinion is to go with the RHEL %ifnarch s390 s390x - we (at least
> ppc + s390) want to be close to the enterprise kernel
But then I have to do work instead of just running 'git am' :). OK,
OK. I'll tweak it to match RHEL.
josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
