On 01.05.2014 05:40, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 01-05-2014 00:14, Chuck Anderson escreveu: >> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:04:05AM +0200, poma wrote: >>> >>> There is a discrepancy in the terminology of these two packages: >>> - kernel-drivers[1] >>> - kernel-modules-extra >>> >>> Are these[1] modules passed the driving test? >>> Should I read the "Banana Split" thread, again? >>> Perhaps the "kernel-modules" for the "kernel-drivers" is the proper name. >> >> I should have brought that up when the split was first proposed, but I >> agree and I do not like this inconsistency. The new one should be >> called kernel-modules, or the old kernel-modules-extra should be >> renamed kernel-drivers-extra. > > I vote for kernel-modules and kernel-modules-extra, as not all modules > are drivers. > > Marcelo > Very well and succinctly explained! poma _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
