Re: New package naming scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em 01-05-2014 00:14, Chuck Anderson escreveu:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:04:05AM +0200, poma wrote:

There is a discrepancy in the terminology of these two packages:
- kernel-drivers[1]
- kernel-modules-extra

Are these[1] modules passed the driving test?
Should I read the "Banana Split" thread, again?
Perhaps the "kernel-modules" for the "kernel-drivers" is the proper name.

I should have brought that up when the split was first proposed, but I
agree and I do not like this inconsistency.  The new one should be
called kernel-modules, or the old kernel-modules-extra should be
renamed kernel-drivers-extra.

I vote for kernel-modules and kernel-modules-extra, as not all modules are drivers.

Marcelo

_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux