On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 05:04 +0200, poma wrote: > There is a discrepancy in the terminology of these two packages: > - kernel-drivers[1] > - kernel-modules-extra > > Are these[1] modules passed the driving test? > Should I read the "Banana Split" thread, again? > Perhaps the "kernel-modules" for the "kernel-drivers" is the proper name. When dealing with the general Fedora public (not those who typically pay attention to the kernel in specific), I think kernel-drivers gives a sense of "hey, I might need this package" when something is not working. Kernel-modules-extra is really a package of things we expect very few people to be using and should not be considered of the same urgency. While yes, the naming is inconsistent with the two packages, I think it is consistent with the intent. Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
