Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> Am 05.03.2014 17:28, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
> > Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> Also,  I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start
> >> higher, say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)
> > 
> > This entire disk size optimization seems kind of weird to me. 
> 
> in case of kernel agreed
> in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance

At least for my uses, the amount of non persistent disk space isn't a
big deal. If I need disk space, I would attach a persistent volume... 

I'd care much more about memory usage, boot time (you want to spin
things up fast), and cpu usage (cpus are likely the most scarce
resource for me at least). 

kevin
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux