Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Also,  I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher,
> say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)

This entire disk size optimization seems kind of weird to me. 

I just booted a f20 offiical cloud image in our openstack cloud. I used
the m1.tiny (smallest size, no persistent storage): 

Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1        20G  1.1G   19G   6% /

Is a few 10's of MB's really worth making our kernel a bunch more
complex? Is disk space the right thing to be trying to optimize? 

Perhaps I am missing it, but are there cases where the current cloud
image is too large? what are they?

kevin
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux