Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 05.03.2014 17:28, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
> Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Also,  I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher,
>> say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)
> 
> This entire disk size optimization seems kind of weird to me. 

in case of kernel agreed
in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance

> I just booted a f20 offiical cloud image in our openstack cloud. I used
> the m1.tiny (smallest size, no persistent storage): 
> 
> Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/vda1        20G  1.1G   19G   6% /

way too fat and i even regret the 5.8 GB rootfs on 30 instances
but was unsure in 2008 how much reservation would be needed

[root@proxy:~]$ df
Filesystem     Type  Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1      ext4  5.8G  681M  5.1G  12% /
/dev/sda1      ext4  493M   34M  460M   7% /boot

_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux