Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:23:27 -0500 > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> So there'd be a filesystem bug, and new filesystem bugs would be >> listed as blockers for that bug? I -think- that method would give >> anyone cc'd on the top bug notifications automagically right? >> Whereas a whiteboard will require someone to actually go search? If >> I've got that all right then the blocker idea makes most sense to me. > > Yeah, I think tracker bugs for each of the subsystems would make the > most sense. > > That way anyone interested in the subsystem could add themselves to cc > and would get a email about dependent bugs being added/closed, etc. > > You could get a list via the blocker bug too or search on it if you > prefer. > > I talked to the X bugzapper/triager and for X related bugs he just > suggested reassigning them to the xorg-x11-drv-whatever component and > let them go from there. > > So, would you be interested in any FS related bug then? or just ext* > or ? any fs bug is fine for now I think. I'll recruit others to watch it as well ;) -Eric _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
