Kevin Fenzi wrote: > ok, finally having time to work on this some more... :) > > It doesn't seem that at this time there is much we can do with > bugzilla.redhat.com to help with the reporter end. Fedora packages sync > from pkgdb out and we can't easily add subsystems without making some > kind of seperate list for kernel. So, I think at least for now, we are > stuck trying to triage the bugs after they are submitted unless > someone can come up with some way we can beat our infrastructure to our > wishes. > > I did some more cleanup on > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage > > Some more questions moving forward: > > - Can someone check the table there and update it? For example, for > video hardware, do we want to reassign? or just cc those folks? Do > they want their real addresses there, or just add 'xgl-maint'. Other > places I am sure are wrong, like PATA. Are their other known > subsystem maintainers? > > - We need a way to mark bugs by subsystem. I think our choices are: > whiteboard, or blocker bugs. Is there a preference? We should add the > bugs or whiteboard keywords to the subsystem table there. We can also > point people to those for filing new bugs as well. So there'd be a filesystem bug, and new filesystem bugs would be listed as blockers for that bug? I -think- that method would give anyone cc'd on the top bug notifications automagically right? Whereas a whiteboard will require someone to actually go search? If I've got that all right then the blocker idea makes most sense to me. -Eric _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
