On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:55:03PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 07/12/2007 12:36 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:29:08AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > I'm going to assume you're asking "why doesn't davej like that idea", > > > since the mv desire is probably obvious (compliance w/packaging > > > standards). Basically, because cvs sucks, and all revision history goes > > > bye-bye if we do the move. Though really... Dave, how big a deal is that > > > really if we do it this early in rawhide? You can always go to the attic > > > if you *really* need to see some historical info on the spec, and we'll > > > have plenty built back up by the time we get to F8... > > > > Probably not so big a deal if we do it right now I guess. > > It's been handy in the past for "it broke somewhere between 1.2345 and > > 1.2367", but tbh now that we have sensible versioning, that at least > > partially solves that probably without the need for cvs annotate. > > > > Feel free to rename it, but be sure to fix up all the scripts/makefiles too. > > Maybe not such a good idea, since lots of external documentation refers > to 'kernel-2.6.spec' as well. Well, it'll catch up eventually. A lot of that documentation needs updating almost every time we do a release anyway for some reason or another. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
