Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 07/12/2007 12:36 PM, Dave Jones wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:29:08AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> > I'm going to assume you're asking "why doesn't davej like that idea", >> > since the mv desire is probably obvious (compliance w/packaging >> > standards). Basically, because cvs sucks, and all revision history goes >> > bye-bye if we do the move. Though really... Dave, how big a deal is that >> > really if we do it this early in rawhide? You can always go to the attic >> > if you *really* need to see some historical info on the spec, and we'll >> > have plenty built back up by the time we get to F8... >> >> Probably not so big a deal if we do it right now I guess. >> It's been handy in the past for "it broke somewhere between 1.2345 and >> 1.2367", but tbh now that we have sensible versioning, that at least >> partially solves that probably without the need for cvs annotate. >> >> Feel free to rename it, but be sure to fix up all the scripts/makefiles too. > > Maybe not such a good idea, since lots of external documentation refers > to 'kernel-2.6.spec' as well. With luck, people will be bright enough to figure it out... :) But we can do a possible spec name change separate from the proposed config changes. Speaking of which, they were just checked in (blame davej, he said 'do it'). -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
