On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:55:49PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 07/11/2007 12:48 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > I submitted a push request for the FC6 update I did w/the other pre-F7 > > update system, but haven't got any notice about it being pushed just > > yet. I'll ping someone in rel-eng. > > > > Can't wait for FC-6 to die now, so we don't have two different ways of > > doing things (er, make that three w/the RHEL stuff I do too)... > > > > Not until December... > > I wonder if we shouldn't just be very conservative with FC6 and drop > the cpuidle there patch as well. Then that update wouldn't be needed. > Otherwise we've got to add another 'requires' to the kernel package. Oh good point, cpuidle is part of that massive -hrt update, so when we drop 64bit tickless it goes away anyway.. > (And I assume the cpuspeed update still works with old 2.6.18 kernels > in case someone updates cpuspeed but not the kernel?) it would, it's just tightening a check for files in sysfs to not pick up the new cpuidle dir, just the cpuN dirs. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
