Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 07/11/2007 12:48 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> I submitted a push request for the FC6 update I did w/the other pre-F7 >> update system, but haven't got any notice about it being pushed just >> yet. I'll ping someone in rel-eng. >> >> Can't wait for FC-6 to die now, so we don't have two different ways of >> doing things (er, make that three w/the RHEL stuff I do too)... >> > > Not until December... Yeah, I know. Damned users wanting us to support stuff for more than 6mo... ;) > I wonder if we shouldn't just be very conservative with FC6 and drop > the cpuidle there patch as well. Then that update wouldn't be needed. > Otherwise we've got to add another 'requires' to the kernel package. worksforme, but I don't really run fc6 anywhere anymore either. > (And I assume the cpuspeed update still works with old 2.6.18 kernels > in case someone updates cpuspeed but not the kernel?) Yep, the change is really minor (just a slightly stricter pattern match when looking for per-cpu cpufreq bits in /sys -- match cpu[0-9]* instead of cpu*), works just fine with older kernels. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
