On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:50:45PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > actually x86-64 tickless has been in rawhide about 2 weeks, and is now > > in this rebase for FC6/F7. Whether we roll with it for a proper update > > depends on how it fares during it's trial in updates-testing. > > So far the forced-hpet part was the only bit that's caused trouble > > afaics, so with that disabled, it should be (hopefully) boring. > > Ah. Now I see it. I was looking for 'hz', not 'hires-timers'. I haven't tried > forced hpet support yet. Am I right in thinking that's only for Intels? > (Mine's an AMD based Mitac). So far, yes. +//DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ESB2_0, +// ich_force_enable_hpet); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_1, + ich_force_enable_hpet); +//DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_1, +// ich_force_enable_hpet); +//DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_31, +// ich_force_enable_hpet); +//DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_1, +// ich_force_enable_hpet); however on some other chipsets, mainline already does force-enabling.. For example on my VIA EPIA ... [ 28.152336] Force enabled HPET at base address 0xfed00000 Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
