Hi. On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:53:06 Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:07:05AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Wednesday 11 July 2007 07:34:10 Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:48:57PM +0200, dragoran wrote: > > > > > > > * Some of the experimental bits (like tickless), I've left enabled > > > > > right now. Depending on how things look from the first round > > > > > of testing will decide whether we keep it on for release. > > > > > > > > > > > > what about the x86_64 hpet issue? (or is x86_64 tickless not included > > yet?) > > > > No, it's not in vanilla yet, and we don't have the patch in our tree. > > actually x86-64 tickless has been in rawhide about 2 weeks, and is now > in this rebase for FC6/F7. Whether we roll with it for a proper update > depends on how it fares during it's trial in updates-testing. > So far the forced-hpet part was the only bit that's caused trouble > afaics, so with that disabled, it should be (hopefully) boring. Ah. Now I see it. I was looking for 'hz', not 'hires-timers'. I haven't tried forced hpet support yet. Am I right in thinking that's only for Intels? (Mine's an AMD based Mitac). > Also, Thomas is usually really on the ball at fixing up silly stuff, so > if the initial cut doesn't look so good, it shouldn't be too long before > we can get it back into peoples hands. Yeah. He was really good to deal with when I had some interaction with him. > > FWIW, I'm running x86_64 tickless. I had some initial issues with hibernating > > and suspending, but worked them through with Thomas. It shouldn't cause any > > issues on that front if/when it does go in. > > Once this is out there, and the worse of the fallout has been dealt with > we really should try and organise some concerted effort to getting > suspend/resume regressions under control, because since FC5, we've more > or less just ignored those bugs due to being buried in other stuff. That would be good. I've been trying to get some of them dealt with, but one day a week makes it slow going. Hughsie has been having a go too, so we're making progress. Nevertheless.... Regards, Nigel
Attachment:
pgpkiEozhJ2Ac.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
