> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> <snip>
>> The other crazy idea I had was to call 2.6.22-rc7
>> 2.6.22-0.rc7.git0.1.fc8. Making fedora_build auto-increment is probabl=
y
>> cleaner, though it'd be nice to also have it reset on a kernel major
>> version rebase (either manually or automagically).
>=20
>=20
> I was going to propose something similar[1], but the proposal of using
> 0.%{fedora_build}.rc7 sounded much better to me and I dropped it
> before sending to the list.
>=20
>=20
> [1] My idea was using something like this:
>=20
> 2.6.22-rc7 =3D> kernel-2.6.22-0.rc7.0.%{something else}
> 2.6.22-rc7-git1 =3D> kernel-2.6.22-0.rc7.1.git1.%{something else}
> 2.6.22 =3D> kernel-2.6.22-%{something else}
>=20
Well, we've already done something to address this, but for giggles,
I'll throw out one more idea that would have worked:
2.6.22-0.rc7.1.fc8 < 2.6.22-0.rc7_git2.1.fc8
But eh. What's there now worksforme, and it actually lines up better
with the official fedora packaging guidelines (we'll just ignore the
bazillion other things the kernel spec does that don't ;).
/me heads out the door for a mini-vacation, back Saturday...
--=20
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
