On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:32:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:26:06PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:56:45PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:52:00AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > > > > It's non-obvious to me what %{?buildid} is, but it seems to
> > > > > > auto-increment.
> > > > >
> > > > > buildid is the "please set this to .me" one.
> > > > > fedora_build is the one to bump on commit.
> > > >
> > > > Can't %{fedora_build} be set based on the $Revision$ keyword, to be
> > > > incremented automatically on commit, just like %{specrelease} was
> > > > auto-incremeted previously?
> > >
> > > Yes, it can. With..
> > >
> > > %define fedora_build %(R="$Revision: 1.3125 $"; RR="${R##: }"; echo %${RR%%?} | sed s/1\.//)
> > >
> > > Which would yield..
> > >
> > > kernel-2.6.22-0.3125.rc7.fc8
> >
> > %define fedora_cvs_origin 3120
> > %define fedora_build %(R="$Revision: 1.3125 $"; R="${R%% \$}"; R="${R##: 1.}"; expr $R - %{fedora_cvs_origin})
> >
> > Change fedora_cvs_origin to current $Revision$ s/1.// when you change sublevel.
>
> I'm guessing the idea here is that it starts counting from 0 again each
> time we rebase? Sounds admirable, but it doesn't seem to work when I
> try it with your change.
never mind, I got bitten by the 'thou shalt not comment out macros with #'
bug yet again. I committed this change, thanks.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
