Re: spec hacks for vanilla and git-based kernel rpm builds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:27:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
>  > > Shipping it with 'rc3' or whatever in the title seems a little more
>  > > honest at least about what we're shipping, and at the same time,
>  > > it prevents bad reviewers from writing "Fedora still ships with a 2.6.22
>  > > kernel".
>  > 
>  > A proper kernel naming would help there as well (e.g. name the kernels
>  > just as upstream -- e.g. 2.6.23-rc[1-7]{,.git[0-9]*). ;-) Yeah, this old
>  > topic again that never got solved.
> 
> Indeed. That's what Jarod was proposing to fix no?

Well, initially, I was thinking only for the vanilla variant to start
out, but screw it, I'll go whole hog. Working on it now...

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux